+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Volume in Time book companion

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Pascal View Post
    Why would somebody write something in a book that has offered a trading advantage.
    Only a naive guy like me will write a book.
    Who wrote: "I could advertise my secrets in the Wall street journal and few would read it" (paraphrased) ?

    IMO your EV is remarkable :) - but it still needs a human mind to analyse the information and put it all together - into a picture of what goes on in the market.

    My hope is, that the need for human analysis will protect the EV-edge for a litte time.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by PeterR View Post
    Who wrote: "I could advertise my secrets in the Wall street journal and few would read it" (paraphrased) ?

    IMO your EV is remarkable :) - but it still needs a human mind to analyse the information and put it all together - into a picture of what goes on in the market.

    My hope is, that the need for human analysis will protect the EV-edge for a litte time.
    The Money Flow which is based on EV (and on a few not published tricks) offers edges that other tools do not offer. I often recognize it when real-time divergences occur.



    Pascal

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Pascal View Post
    The Money Flow which is based on EV (and on a few not published tricks) offers edges that other tools do not offer. I often recognize it when real-time divergences occur.



    Pascal
    Agree with others about your book, Pascal. Question that may have already been asked in the past: have you closely examined Laszlo Birinyi's money flow work and, if so, how does yours differ?

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by adam ali View Post
    Agree with others about your book, Pascal. Question that may have already been asked in the past: have you closely examined Laszlo Birinyi's money flow work and, if so, how does yours differ?
    Adam,


    The volume/price based indicator that use daily data tend to try to catch bullish/bearish moves. Birinyi's indicator is from that type.

    The EV indicator is very different because it works on smaller intervals of one minute and it basically measures an equilibrium around small minute price changes. Then, the LEV/SEV separation allows to detect what large players are doing because their activity has a greater impact on the small equilibrium modifications.



    Pascal

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Pascal View Post
    The Money Flow which is based on EV (and on a few not published tricks) ...
    I was planning on coding myself the Total Money Flow the way it's explained in the book. Does this mean I won't obtain the same values as the ones you publish here?

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by xavik View Post
    I was planning on coding myself the Total Money Flow the way it's explained in the book. Does this mean I won't obtain the same values as the ones you publish here?
    Hi Xavik,


    Only the Effective Volume, the Total Effective Volume, the Effective Ratio and the Active Boundaries indicators are fully explained in the VIT book.

    The sectors based Money Flow is derived from the above indicators, but not fully explained in the book.

    However it is not that difficult to do: the Total Money Flow based on the EV calculation is the EV figure multiplied by the price. When you calculate that for a sector, you need to weigh each stock. You can use a capitalization based weight, a fixed weight or any other method you can think of. For the XLX ETFs for example, I use the weights that are officially published by the S&P. That is you to decide.

    The main difficulty is how to code the EV indicator, but many developers could do it.



    Pascal

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts