+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Combo-MF Position Sizing

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brugge-Belgium
    Posts
    394
    As my new back tests are showing now, I will be using 5 of the 9 sub-components of the S&P sectors: XLB, XLF, XLI, XLK & XLY besides my Combo-MF.
    Finding valid ETFs for these sub-components is easy except for XLY. XLY is the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund. Stock-Encyclopedia.com gives UGE and UCC as double ETFs for respectively Consumer Goods and Consumer Services. I am a bit puzzled which one to choose: UGE or UCC

    Can anyone advice?

    PdP

  2. #2

    uge vs. ucc

    pdp,

    pascal, paul duncan, or someone else could probably advise better, but it looks to me like the composition of UCC http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hl?s=UCC+Holdings is more similar to XLY http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hl?s=XLY+Holdings than UGE http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hl?s=UGE+Holdings

    lisa

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brugge-Belgium
    Posts
    394
    Lisa,

    Thanks for the reply. Indeed, UCC looks better in terms of composition. I will use UCC for my back-tests.
    I hope to report my progress soon.

    PdP

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brugge-Belgium
    Posts
    394
    UCC is not so good to trade. Certain days, there is no volume at all. I think that the quotes for UCC that I get from Reuters (I use MetaStock EOD) are not reliable for UCC.
    For the XLY model, I will use the single ETF XLY for my back tests.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts