+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: New 20DMF RT

  1. #1

    New 20DMF RT

    The new 20DMF is available here.

    http://www.effectivevolume.com/conte...1068-real-time

    The main changes are the explanatory messages and the fact that the short signals are now confirmed by the Cumulative ticks instead of the inversed ETFs.



    Pascal

    Name:  New 20DMF.gif
Views: 815
Size:  3.8 KB

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Pascal View Post
    The new 20DMF is available here.

    http://www.effectivevolume.com/conte...1068-real-time

    The main changes are the explanatory messages and the fact that the short signals are now confirmed by the Cumulative ticks instead of the inversed ETFs.



    Pascal

    Attachment 16254
    Thanks for the new signals Pascal.

    Do you get the Cumalative Tick from Tradestation ? If so which settings do you use ?

    Trev

  3. #3
    We get the raw data from our data supplier and calculate the Cumulative Tick and its average.


    Pascal

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Pascal View Post
    We get the raw data from our data supplier and calculate the Cumulative Tick and its average.


    Pascal
    Your charts have stuck at 11:50 US time ? At quite a critical spot I think !

    Trev

  5. #5
    Yes. The system froze when it issued the short signal.

    I think that this is a Java bug.

    We are working on it.

    Pascal

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brugge-Belgium
    Posts
    394
    Pascal,

    The current message states "buy when OBOS crosses over 30".
    Shouldn't that be -30?

  7. #7
    When we are in Short mode and cross below -30, a forced buy is executed when the OB/OS returns back above +30, if the MF is still in negative at that time.

    pascal

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    189
    Pascal,

    Are the discontinuity jumps at the open of the cum tick moving average to be believed?

    Harry

  9. #9
    There was a jump yesterday morning because we started the service at 9:40 instead of 9:30 and the price gap attracted buying for the first 10 minutes.

    The Cumulative Ticks of the previous days - before the system was put on-line yesterday - is not correct as there was a calculation error that has since been corrected.


    Pascal

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Pascal View Post
    There was a jump yesterday morning because we started the service at 9:40 instead of 9:30 and the price gap attracted buying for the first 10 minutes.

    The Cumulative Ticks of the previous days - before the system was put on-line yesterday - is not correct as there was a calculation error that has since been corrected.


    Pascal
    Is the Cumalative Tick based on The R2000, NYSE, or All US ?

    Also, the current graph does not show the CumTick passing down through the 600min. Why is this please ?

    Thanks in advance.
    Trev

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts