+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Clusters Update - February 7, 2012

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Brussels, Belgium
    Posts
    1,999

    Clusters Update - February 7, 2012

    Nothing really changed, while money flows keep pointing to lartge players supporting the markets.
    Billy

    Name:  iwm120207.gif
Views: 219
Size:  43.0 KB
    Name:  gdx120207.gif
Views: 224
Size:  47.6 KB

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Seattle, Washington USA
    Posts
    151

    bonds down?

    Having lost much money last year in TBT, I'm very sensitive to the current anomalous behavior:

    Name:  Capture.PNG
Views: 184
Size:  29.0 KB

    Bonds down? Equities down? I've read the bond market is correct 90% of the time. If so, the current large player accumulation patterns are most telling, I would bet:

    Name:  Capture2.PNG
Views: 194
Size:  27.9 KBName:  Capture3.PNG
Views: 186
Size:  20.3 KB

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Seattle, Washington USA
    Posts
    151

    P/C ratio

    Name:  Capture6.PNG
Views: 177
Size:  34.9 KB

    It is very interesting that the put/call ratio has decreased from approximately 2.5 to .8 since yesterday.

    Ernst, can you comment?

    Name:  Capture5.PNG
Views: 146
Size:  132.2 KB

    Here I mark where a down gap-fill might mark a reversal along the ascending 10 DMA. This is crystal ball territory.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Victoria, BC, Canada
    Posts
    54
    Pascal,

    The message on the RT GDX saying "The short signal in 2.39 days would not be triggered due to low volatility" Does this mean, if MF closes below MF=0 minus porosity, the robot will not call for a short the next day?

    I was looking back at January 25th when we had the strong bounce in GDX. Below is 5 day snap shot starting on the Jan 19th. I remember the strong bounce on the 19th exactly at MF=O. Also on the 25th when MF was approaching zero, was the huge rally. If the short is not in the cards, then it sure looks like going long as MF approached zero, with a stop at MF = 0 minus porosity, would be of interest.

    BTW, I'm still short, GDX with a plan to cover if MF > 1.

    Dave

    Name:  Capture1.JPG
Views: 152
Size:  68.4 KB

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by davidallison@shaw.ca View Post
    Pascal,

    The message on the RT GDX saying "The short signal in 2.39 days would not be triggered due to low volatility" Does this mean, if MF closes below MF=0 minus porosity, the robot will not call for a short the next day?

    I was looking back at January 25th when we had the strong bounce in GDX. Below is 5 day snap shot starting on the Jan 19th. I remember the strong bounce on the 19th exactly at MF=O. Also on the 25th when MF was approaching zero, was the huge rally. If the short is not in the cards, then it sure looks like going long as MF approached zero, with a stop at MF = 0 minus porosity, would be of interest.

    BTW, I'm still short, GDX with a plan to cover if MF > 1.

    Dave
    This message means that as of today, we are still more than two days from crossing below the 0 level, where a short signal would be produced. However, the ATR as of today is very low. This indicates that the move back down to 0 is not due to real selling, but most probably to the fact the the indicator is an oscillator that naturally comes back top 0. This is not a sign that we need to short. hence, if we fall below zero on a low ATR, the probability that we'll move back up rather fast is high. In such a condition, you'd better be prepared to buy.

    Of course, we will know it better when we are closer to the zero level.



    Pascal

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts