Quote Originally Posted by Andrei View Post
Billy,

As much as we talk about this issue, is 3:1 RR cast in stone and can not be modified to make an improvement of the entry points? Yesterday we came to about 0.5% of a Buy signal. I'm sure it frustrates you as much as me to see a large gap up like today.

But there is another side of the coin - sure we are in headline driven environment and no mechanical system can predict, what authorities might or might not do tomorrow. Hence, sticking to the proven rule is the best thing we can do now... Furthermore, probably were it not for headlines, we could get out 68.74 entry today.

My main question - is a slight deviation to a 3:1 RR brings with it a worse long term performance?


Thank you.
Andrei,
Of course it is frustrating. Like I wrote this morning in another thread:
“Both the LT and ST edges are computed using 3:1 RR multi-pivots entries. So these edges can only be achieved assuming that you enter exactly at the robot’s recommended 3:1 RR limit price. Robot’s edges can be further improved only when you enter at better prices, not worst ones.

If you review the pdfs on the IWM robot’s design and backtesting, the 3:1 RR multipivots rules have a neutral-to-positive impact on returns but lower considerably the drawdowns. They are an essential risk management component of the IWM robot’s LT risk-adjusted performance.”

I believe that most robot subscribers are generally more interested by the risk management rules included in the robot’s system than by the returns which normally take good care of themselves. Nothing prevents anyone to make discretionary exceptions to the risk management safeguards and to assume responsibility for their own decisions. Sometimes it will work, sometimes not. But discretion implies driving in the dark without backtested lights. In difficult extraordinary times, the first goal should be protection of capital and I believe the robot is fulfilling that task well. Making money is easy, keeping it is hard.

I think that the market is rewarding very bad trading habits at the moment and it won’t last long. Among good habits you need to focus on the process (quality of the trades setups), not the outcome (profits/losses). Also, you need to know what your edge is and trade only when you have an edge at the exact limit prices and stops that are providing the edge. The robot is just keeping its good habits.

Traders usually get messed up when they lose patience and try to change their rules with every exceptional event. The robot is not human, fortunately!
Billy