+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Nat Gas Trade

  1. #1

    Nat Gas Trade

    I received the following e-mail from a reader of the daily comment of September 14.
    Before discussing this interesting message, I want to stress that I do not give personalized advises.
    This is too much responsibility and I noticed that the more advises I gave in the past the more requests/questions would consecutively come. What I share in the daily comments is my own market analysis upon which I base the trades that I execute independently of the IWM/GDX robots.

    The message is here:
    Yesterday I bought my first trade based on your comments that natural gas makes
    for a high probability long trade. During the recent hours, however, natural gas prices
    have fallen through the floor and have lost a lot. Is there a logical explanation for this
    and do you think I should cut my losses and sell right away or wait for the volatility to
    fade? Also, if it is expected to go up, would you expect $4.60 to be a good upside target
    ?


    A first trade is very important and is usually a loss. You need to keep this loss small and survive for another trade.
    On my comment of yesterday, I did not advise to buy Nat gas, but to buy Nat gas producers (I stated SWN, UPL and ECA. I myself bought SWN/UPL), because the market was ready to bounce and these would get the extra juice from a Nat gas futures buying activity. You can see that even if Nat gas dipped today, these stocks did not.

    Regarding the Nat Gas trade, I believe that you should take your loss if the price breaks below support (which I doubt it will) or if the TEV breaks below its average, which is certainly a possibility. The most difficult is to manage this together with contract roll-overs.

    As a reminder for everyone here: do not trade the UNG/USO ETFs, because they need to roll their contracts and hence incur losses. You can see that on the comparison to their respective Futures prices.


    Pascal

    Name:  UNG_FUT.gif
Views: 211
Size:  16.1 KB

    Name:  UNG.gif
Views: 206
Size:  49.8 KBName:  USO.gif
Views: 185
Size:  52.0 KB

  2. #2
    Thank you for the clarification.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts