+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Stages Outlook of the Rally

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Brussels, Belgium
    Posts
    1,999
    Quote Originally Posted by adam ali View Post
    Billy,

    When you say the trailing stop will rise exponentially faster over time, why is that? I assume it has to do with contracting volatility but not sure how the math works to cause the stop to move this way.

    Also, I'm trying to figure out how to use ATR in such a fashion that it can "target" drawdown percentages. In other words, if I'm not comfortable with the historical intra-trade drawdown of an instrument, is there a way to manipulate ATR to maximize return while keeping drawdowns to the stated percentage.

    I confess I'm relatively new to the ATR concept.
    Adam,

    1) The trailing stop is a function of ATR% deducted from the highest closing price. The faster the ATR% decreases, the faster the trailing stop will get close to the trading price.

    2) It is foolish to try to use ATR for targeting fixed drawdown percentages. If you can't stand more than X% drawdowns, just use a fixed X% percentage stop. But your performance will decrease drastically unless you sell often on targets. But even such a strategy with optimal targets will underperform significantly risk-adjusted returns from a trailing ATR% stop.

    Billy
    Last edited by Billy; 07-06-2011 at 12:25 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Montreal Quebec Canada
    Posts
    55

    Exponential stop

    Quote Originally Posted by Billy View Post
    The trailing stop is a function of ATR% deducted from the highest closing price. The faster the ATR% decreases, the faster the trailing stop will get close to the trading price.
    Very useful information Billy which makes me think of J. Welles Wilder's parabolic system (Stop and Reverse or SAR) presumably just on the long side.

    I presume that the same exponential approach is valid when one is short? Yes or No
    or the model is different for a short trade because your research has shown a different optimal stop strategy when short.

    Pierre

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Pierre Brodeur View Post
    Very useful information Billy which makes me think of J. Welles Wilder's parabolic system (Stop and Reverse or SAR) presumably just on the long side.

    I presume that the same exponential approach is valid when one is short? Yes or No
    or the model is different for a short trade because your research has shown a different optimal stop strategy when short.

    Pierre
    We indeed use the same stop strategy for both Long/Short positions.

    Pascal

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy View Post
    2) It is foolish to try to use ATR for targeting fixed drawdown percentages. If you can't stand more than X% drawdowns, just use a fixed X% percentage stop. But your performance will decrease drastically unless you sell often on targets. But even such a strategy with optimal targets will underperform significantly risk-adjusted returns from a trailing ATR% stop.

    Billy
    The term "X% drawdown with a fixed stop" is really a MAE (max adverse excursion) for a single trade, which is not the same as account drawdown on open equity spanning consecutive trades. Without extensive backtesting, I believe it's impossible to arrive at drawdown estimates for any given stop strategy.

    Trader D

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts