+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Allocation of the robots

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    45

    Allocation of the robots

    Hi all,

    Anyone can share how much their total investment portfolio will be allocated to the two robots if they subscribed. I am thinking about my allocation, so just want to have more opinion.

    Also, any idea how to allocation among the two robots, is it half/half or in a ratio?

    Thanks for your suggestion,

    Ellis

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    172
    Hi Ellis,

    You many consider checking the following two threads for recent discussion of allocation ideas:

    http://www.effectivevolume.com/showt...3836#post13836

    http://www.effectivevolume.com/showt...ionary+trading

    Best,

    Eric

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    45
    Thanks Eric, it is very useful.

    Also, I tried to follow the trade on this doc.

    http://www.effectivevolume.eu/conten...rading_IWM.pdf
    But the trade doesn't seem to match what I can find in yahoo finance for IWM.

    For example.
    The doc has
    Shorted 7/25/2007 8/1/2007 77.42 74.37 3.94% 1.12%

    I found in yahoo finance. On 25Jul, the OHLC is 81.46,81.77, 79.83, 80.70. Am I missing something?



    Annex 1: Trades of the 20DMF applied to IWM
    Average drawdown long trades: 6.22%
    Average drawdown short trades: 3.41%
    Start date End date Start Price End Price Profit/loss Drawdowns
    Shorted 7/25/2007 8/1/2007 77.42 74.37 3.94% 1.12%
    Bought 8/1/2007 11/1/2007 74.37 76.11 2.34% 5.71%
    Shorted 11/1/2007 11/6/2007 76.11 76.9 -1.04% 2.64%
    Shorted 11/7/2007 11/29/2007 74.52 73.29 1.65% 2.04%

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    45
    Also for example, I found the following in Today's IWM robot

    Magagement of an existing position
    The 20DMF has been in BUY mode since the close of 6/9/2011.
    The robot's current position is a BUY that took place on 6/10/2011.
    The buy entry price was 78.39 and the current stop level is 79.59. Last close: 82.2

    The entry price was 78.39 but here's the OHLC of IWM on 9,10 Jun

    9Jun 79.08 79.71, 78.73 79.27
    10Jun 78.78,78.91,77.65,78

    So, is the buy signal given after close of 10Jun?
    Hope someone can help me to clarify?

    Cheers,

    Ellis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Victoria, BC, Canada
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by mingpan.lam View Post
    Also for example, I found the following in Today's IWM robot

    Magagement of an existing position
    The 20DMF has been in BUY mode since the close of 6/9/2011.
    The robot's current position is a BUY that took place on 6/10/2011.
    The buy entry price was 78.39 and the current stop level is 79.59. Last close: 82.2

    The entry price was 78.39 but here's the OHLC of IWM on 9,10 Jun

    9Jun 79.08 79.71, 78.73 79.27
    10Jun 78.78,78.91,77.65,78

    So, is the buy signal given after close of 10Jun?
    Hope someone can help me to clarify?

    Cheers,

    Ellis
    Ellis, The robot issued a buy for the 10th of June at a price of 78.39. This was filled later in the day on the 10th, as the price of IWM dropped to the entry level and was filled. The signal is valid after the close on the 9th, but was not published until a few hours before market open on the 10th. Hope this helps, Dave

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Brussels, Belgium
    Posts
    1,999
    Quote Originally Posted by davidallison@shaw.ca View Post
    Ellis, The robot issued a buy for the 10th of June at a price of 78.39. This was filled later in the day on the 10th, as the price of IWM dropped to the entry level and was filled. The signal is valid after the close on the 9th, but was not published until a few hours before market open on the 10th. Hope this helps, Dave
    Thank you Dave, your comment is correct.
    For the old (backtest) 2007 trades, I will check with Pascal or I'm sure he will jump in the thread.
    About the allocations, they will be further detailed in the Algo & Multi pivot forum over time.
    If you trade only IWM/RWM, then the optimal proportion of GDX is much higher than if you trade the double or triple-leveraged IWM related ETFs. However, note that the backtest period included the most volatile market in a decade and future results may differ much if we enter a period of stable volatility.
    Pascal will post soon an enlighting robot drawdown study for GDX compared to IWM that demonstrates that non-leveraged and double-leveraged IWM trading should be combined with GDX trading for optimal portfolio risk-adjusted performance.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy View Post
    Thank you Dave, your comment is correct.
    For the old (backtest) 2007 trades, I will check with Pascal or I'm sure he will jump in the thread.
    About the allocations, they will be further detailed in the Algo & Multi pivot forum over time.
    If you trade only IWM/RWM, then the optimal proportion of GDX is much higher than if you trade the double or triple-leveraged IWM related ETFs. However, note that the backtest period included the most volatile market in a decade and future results may differ much if we enter a period of stable volatility.
    Pascal will post soon an enlighting robot drawdown study for GDX compared to IWM that demonstrates that non-leveraged and double-leveraged IWM trading should be combined with GDX trading for optimal portfolio risk-adjusted performance.
    Dave's explanations are correct.
    Here is the link to the DD study that I finsihed this morning:

    http://www.effectivevolume.eu/conten...n_analysis.pdf


    Pascal

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by mingpan.lam View Post
    Thanks Eric, it is very useful.

    Also, I tried to follow the trade on this doc.

    http://www.effectivevolume.eu/conten...rading_IWM.pdf
    But the trade doesn't seem to match what I can find in yahoo finance for IWM.

    For example.
    The doc has
    Shorted 7/25/2007 8/1/2007 77.42 74.37 3.94% 1.12%

    I found in yahoo finance. On 25Jul, the OHLC is 81.46,81.77, 79.83, 80.70. Am I missing something?



    Annex 1: Trades of the 20DMF applied to IWM
    Average drawdown long trades: 6.22%
    Average drawdown short trades: 3.41%
    Start date End date Start Price End Price Profit/loss Drawdowns
    Shorted 7/25/2007 8/1/2007 77.42 74.37 3.94% 1.12%
    Bought 8/1/2007 11/1/2007 74.37 76.11 2.34% 5.71%
    Shorted 11/1/2007 11/6/2007 76.11 76.9 -1.04% 2.64%
    Shorted 11/7/2007 11/29/2007 74.52 73.29 1.65% 2.04%
    The difference is simply because on this test I used prices corrected for dividends, while you are looking at the prices non-corrected.


    Pascal

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by Pascal View Post
    Dave's explanations are correct.
    Here is the link to the DD study that I finsihed this morning:

    http://www.effectivevolume.eu/conten...n_analysis.pdf


    Pascal
    Hi Pascal,

    Thanks for the reply.
    During 2008, both IWM and GDX have max draw down more than 25%. But IWM/GDX model has about 10% draw only, during that time. Why that will happen, I will expect it will be still 25% drawdown, I understand they have low correlation factor, but just based on the diagram, they are both making a 25% drawndown at 10/15/2008 but it is only 10% when they combined.

    Also, any suggestion about free dividends adjusted data I can find. I just want to verify the trade myself and if I follow the robot, I can follow it correctly.

    Cheers,

    Ellis

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    45
    Quote Originally Posted by Pascal View Post
    Dave's explanations are correct.
    Here is the link to the DD study that I finsihed this morning:

    http://www.effectivevolume.eu/conten...n_analysis.pdf


    Pascal
    Hi Pascal,

    Can I assume the following? For example,

    Shorted 7/25/2007 8/1/2007 77.42 74.37 3.94% 1.12%

    Means, at 7/25/2007, put a short limited order at 77.42 before the market open and it should be filled, but do you have a protective stop loss order along with the first short limited order?
    at 8/1/2007, closed at 74.37, it should be closed by a trailing stop, can I assume this stop is available before the market open?

    Cheers,

    Ellis

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts