+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Allocation of the robots

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    45

    Allocation of the robots

    Hi all,

    Anyone can share how much their total investment portfolio will be allocated to the two robots if they subscribed. I am thinking about my allocation, so just want to have more opinion.

    Also, any idea how to allocation among the two robots, is it half/half or in a ratio?

    Thanks for your suggestion,

    Ellis

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    172
    Hi Ellis,

    You many consider checking the following two threads for recent discussion of allocation ideas:

    http://www.effectivevolume.com/showt...3836#post13836

    http://www.effectivevolume.com/showt...ionary+trading

    Best,

    Eric

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    45
    Thanks Eric, it is very useful.

    Also, I tried to follow the trade on this doc.

    http://www.effectivevolume.eu/conten...rading_IWM.pdf
    But the trade doesn't seem to match what I can find in yahoo finance for IWM.

    For example.
    The doc has
    Shorted 7/25/2007 8/1/2007 77.42 74.37 3.94% 1.12%

    I found in yahoo finance. On 25Jul, the OHLC is 81.46,81.77, 79.83, 80.70. Am I missing something?



    Annex 1: Trades of the 20DMF applied to IWM
    Average drawdown long trades: 6.22%
    Average drawdown short trades: 3.41%
    Start date End date Start Price End Price Profit/loss Drawdowns
    Shorted 7/25/2007 8/1/2007 77.42 74.37 3.94% 1.12%
    Bought 8/1/2007 11/1/2007 74.37 76.11 2.34% 5.71%
    Shorted 11/1/2007 11/6/2007 76.11 76.9 -1.04% 2.64%
    Shorted 11/7/2007 11/29/2007 74.52 73.29 1.65% 2.04%

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    45
    Also for example, I found the following in Today's IWM robot

    Magagement of an existing position
    The 20DMF has been in BUY mode since the close of 6/9/2011.
    The robot's current position is a BUY that took place on 6/10/2011.
    The buy entry price was 78.39 and the current stop level is 79.59. Last close: 82.2

    The entry price was 78.39 but here's the OHLC of IWM on 9,10 Jun

    9Jun 79.08 79.71, 78.73 79.27
    10Jun 78.78,78.91,77.65,78

    So, is the buy signal given after close of 10Jun?
    Hope someone can help me to clarify?

    Cheers,

    Ellis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Victoria, BC, Canada
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by mingpan.lam View Post
    Also for example, I found the following in Today's IWM robot

    Magagement of an existing position
    The 20DMF has been in BUY mode since the close of 6/9/2011.
    The robot's current position is a BUY that took place on 6/10/2011.
    The buy entry price was 78.39 and the current stop level is 79.59. Last close: 82.2

    The entry price was 78.39 but here's the OHLC of IWM on 9,10 Jun

    9Jun 79.08 79.71, 78.73 79.27
    10Jun 78.78,78.91,77.65,78

    So, is the buy signal given after close of 10Jun?
    Hope someone can help me to clarify?

    Cheers,

    Ellis
    Ellis, The robot issued a buy for the 10th of June at a price of 78.39. This was filled later in the day on the 10th, as the price of IWM dropped to the entry level and was filled. The signal is valid after the close on the 9th, but was not published until a few hours before market open on the 10th. Hope this helps, Dave

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Brussels, Belgium
    Posts
    1,999
    Quote Originally Posted by davidallison@shaw.ca View Post
    Ellis, The robot issued a buy for the 10th of June at a price of 78.39. This was filled later in the day on the 10th, as the price of IWM dropped to the entry level and was filled. The signal is valid after the close on the 9th, but was not published until a few hours before market open on the 10th. Hope this helps, Dave
    Thank you Dave, your comment is correct.
    For the old (backtest) 2007 trades, I will check with Pascal or I'm sure he will jump in the thread.
    About the allocations, they will be further detailed in the Algo & Multi pivot forum over time.
    If you trade only IWM/RWM, then the optimal proportion of GDX is much higher than if you trade the double or triple-leveraged IWM related ETFs. However, note that the backtest period included the most volatile market in a decade and future results may differ much if we enter a period of stable volatility.
    Pascal will post soon an enlighting robot drawdown study for GDX compared to IWM that demonstrates that non-leveraged and double-leveraged IWM trading should be combined with GDX trading for optimal portfolio risk-adjusted performance.

  7. #7
    I used EOD

    pascal

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    45
    Hi Pascal,

    In this doc, "IWM_GDX_Portfolio_Analysis", you mentioned,

    "The combined portfolio is traded using
    all funds available. If both IWM and GDX issue a signal, the funds are divided into two equal
    amounts and each amount is invested in each ETF. If only one ETF issues a signal, all the
    funds are invested in that ETF. If in the middle of a trade of one ETF, the other ETF issues a
    signal, then half of the funds are switched to the ETF that issues a new signal. The only time
    where no fund is invested is only when no signal is available."

    How do we actually implement the combined portfolio?
    For example, we bought IWM already (so 100% IWM) and then we have a signal for GDX.
    Should we sell all IWM in order to buy GDX? But the problem is, the limit order to buy GDX may not be executed.

    If let say, we don't sell IWM and buy GDX with limit order and allocated 50% to GDX and the order executed.
    We will have 150% of the porfolio. And we can only sell half of IWM on the next day.

    Cheers,

    Ellis

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by mingpan.lam View Post
    Thanks Eric, it is very useful.

    Also, I tried to follow the trade on this doc.

    http://www.effectivevolume.eu/conten...rading_IWM.pdf
    But the trade doesn't seem to match what I can find in yahoo finance for IWM.

    For example.
    The doc has
    Shorted 7/25/2007 8/1/2007 77.42 74.37 3.94% 1.12%

    I found in yahoo finance. On 25Jul, the OHLC is 81.46,81.77, 79.83, 80.70. Am I missing something?



    Annex 1: Trades of the 20DMF applied to IWM
    Average drawdown long trades: 6.22%
    Average drawdown short trades: 3.41%
    Start date End date Start Price End Price Profit/loss Drawdowns
    Shorted 7/25/2007 8/1/2007 77.42 74.37 3.94% 1.12%
    Bought 8/1/2007 11/1/2007 74.37 76.11 2.34% 5.71%
    Shorted 11/1/2007 11/6/2007 76.11 76.9 -1.04% 2.64%
    Shorted 11/7/2007 11/29/2007 74.52 73.29 1.65% 2.04%
    The difference is simply because on this test I used prices corrected for dividends, while you are looking at the prices non-corrected.


    Pascal

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts