-
1 Attachment(s)
New 20DMF RT
The new 20DMF is available here.
[url]http://www.effectivevolume.com/content.php?1068-real-time[/url]
The main changes are the explanatory messages and the fact that the short signals are now confirmed by the Cumulative ticks instead of the inversed ETFs.
Pascal
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16254[/ATTACH]
-
[QUOTE=Pascal;23985]The new 20DMF is available here.
[url]http://www.effectivevolume.com/content.php?1068-real-time[/url]
The main changes are the explanatory messages and the fact that the short signals are now confirmed by the Cumulative ticks instead of the inversed ETFs.
Pascal
[ATTACH=CONFIG]16254[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Thanks for the new signals Pascal.
Do you get the Cumalative Tick from Tradestation ? If so which settings do you use ?
Trev
-
We get the raw data from our data supplier and calculate the Cumulative Tick and its average.
Pascal
-
[QUOTE=Pascal;23987]We get the raw data from our data supplier and calculate the Cumulative Tick and its average.
Pascal[/QUOTE]
Your charts have stuck at 11:50 US time ? At quite a critical spot I think !
Trev
-
Yes. The system froze when it issued the short signal.
I think that this is a Java bug.
We are working on it.
Pascal
-
Pascal,
The current message states "buy when OBOS crosses over 30".
Shouldn't that be [COLOR="red"][B]-[/B][/COLOR]30?
-
When we are in Short mode and cross below -30, a forced buy is executed when the OB/OS returns back above +30, if the MF is still in negative at that time.
pascal
-
Pascal,
Are the discontinuity jumps at the open of the cum tick moving average to be believed?
Harry
-
There was a jump yesterday morning because we started the service at 9:40 instead of 9:30 and the price gap attracted buying for the first 10 minutes.
The Cumulative Ticks of the previous days - before the system was put on-line yesterday - is not correct as there was a calculation error that has since been corrected.
Pascal
-
[QUOTE=Pascal;23998]There was a jump yesterday morning because we started the service at 9:40 instead of 9:30 and the price gap attracted buying for the first 10 minutes.
The Cumulative Ticks of the previous days - before the system was put on-line yesterday - is not correct as there was a calculation error that has since been corrected.
Pascal[/QUOTE]
Is the Cumalative Tick based on The R2000, NYSE, or All US ?
Also, the current graph does not show the CumTick passing down through the 600min. Why is this please ?
Thanks in advance.
Trev