PDA

View Full Version : The Buffett conundrum



Timothy Clontz
03-20-2013, 09:06 PM
From: http://market-mousetrap.blogspot.com/2013/03/03202013-buffett-conundrum.html

I’ve written about the Buffett conundrum before, but it’s time to revisit it.

Buffett has a puzzling stance regarding the relationship between government and industry. He keeps crying out for the government to tax him more, and mocking those who are afraid of taxes and regulation. At the same time, he is the master of the art of avoiding capital gains taxes by long term holding, and even avoiding dividend taxes by simply buying the entire company outright. To add to our befuddlement, he is buying “green energy” companies on the hopes that government regulation will force profits his way.

When faced with such contradictions, there are three possible responses.

First, admirers will assume he is speaking so profoundly that when he doesn’t seem to make sense, we must be at fault for our pitiful intellects.

Second, former admirers will look at the obvious contradictions and conclude that he’s completely lost it.

I used to be in the first camp, upgraded to the second, and am dipping my toe in a third way of looking at the man:

Third – he has a hidden agenda.

Let’s assume that Buffett is BOTH a shrewd businessman and investor, AND STILL crying out for business and investment destroying policies. Let’s also assume that he’s not playing some kind of “nyah nyah you can’t tax me” joke on the government. He would know that the joke would be on us instead of the government.

Keep in mind that, unlike Mitt Romney who pays a ton of taxes and gives a ton more to charity, Buffett is holding everything in a death grip that will only be pried loose by the grim reaper himself. He doesn’t sell, so he doesn’t pay capital gains. He buys whole companies, so he doesn’t pay dividend taxes. And he’s holding his charitable contributions for his will to avoid even the death tax.

So, these taxes he’s calling for do NOT affect him – at least not directly.

But what about indirectly?

http://reason.com/archives/2013/03/04/warren-buffetts-economic-confusion

A close read of that article has a telling quote from Buffett about his motives: “Let us unburden you.”

The statement is made both about CEOs who are afraid of government policies and also potential investors in Berkshire.

In other words, the destructive intrusion of government only affects us little folk who are collectively Buffett’s competition. Once you reach his size, you no longer win by competition, but instead by the suppression of competition. This is effectively the modus operandi of a monopoly.

And maybe his most recent years are revealing that monopoly is all he can still play:

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/warren_buffett_falls_to_earth_ynH4Xw9Gb2PFpOIbU1Up cK

As Bugs Bunny is fond of saying, “Of course, you know this means war.”

Higher taxes and regulations ON HIS COMPETITION, does indeed benefit Buffett, and that is precisely why he is crying out for them and getting medals from ideologues who don’t understand how they are being manipulated by Buffett.

So then, in the following posts I will show how to compete with Warren Buffett. The goal isn’t to follow his TRADES, but instead to follow the METHODS that made him rich in years past.

If you follow his trades you’ll just make him richer by pumping up the value of the shares he already owns. What you want to do instead is to anticipate his trades and the trades of other billionaires. As small as we are, we can get into these value companies faster than he can – so instead of pushing up the value of shares he already owns, we can have him push up the value of shares WE already own.

Ready?

This should be fun.

ericoleman
03-21-2013, 12:39 AM
Thanks for some of your recent commentaries Tim. I've been enjoying reading your thoughts and essays.

I can't comment too much on Buffett. I agree that he has specific motivations for his personal views; however, he does seem to have an aversion to dynastic wealth and essentially stated that he was lucky to be born into a system catering to his skills that resulted in his successes. Even if ulterior motives exist, people seem to "like" him because of his relatively humble lifestyle choices and demeanor. Since he doesn't appear to fancy buying islands, amongst other billionaire past times, regular folks generally find him more affable.

Look forward to your continued posts.

Best,
Eric